A few days ago, I had dinner
with a group of people which included one of the folks funding the Heritage
House, in real time cell phone communication with folks organizing the new era.
At one point, she turned to me, and asked: “What do YOU think about our present
situation?”
For a moment, I was amused inside myself about how
impossible this question was. There are SO many different life or death urgent
issues requiring focused deeply informed action... but then, OK, in that
situation, why not talk about where we stand right now in the big picture?
So roughly I said: “We are at
a hugely difficult moment of transition in the big picture. We are debating the
interactions between the economic system and the natural system of human
interaction which comes from millions of years of biological evolution. That’s
still important, but it’s nothing new. What’s new, what introduces the most
uncertainty and instability, is the fundamental change in human life due to two
massive changes in how we organize our lives. Just as important as dollars and
DNA, there are now two additional massive intelligent systems – the new IT
system, and the more powerful crystallizing spiritual consciousness (not
religion, but the objective spiritual reality which religions try to talk
about).
“IT is not just one issue
among many debated in Congress and chased by dollars. It is a massive
organizing system in itself.
It will be defining what the
rules really are, just as much as the Constitution does – and if we don’t get
it right, soon, we are at great risk.”
“The noosphere is not new, certainly,
but the crystallization of consciousness going on now is also massively
important.”
“In essence, the new transitions
of IT and noosphere make us like teenagers at a crucial period of life. We may
grow, or our conflicts may simply kill us. There is no guarantee of survival in
any level of life.” And I mentioned some of the game plans for the Internet of
Things, which could paralyze and then kill us if we do not act quickly to
prevent some terrible possibilities. (Guys like Lamar Smith and Tom Kahlil of
OSTP have been pushing us towards disaster, but, sadly, they are not at all alone
in that.)
In another discussion by
video conferencing with some lead IT people... I said: “I tell the AI people
you need to build an artificial mouse before you can build a real artificial
Einstein. But for this global design issue, it is even more basic. We need stable
cells first, which do not dissolve into goo, before we can afford to
depend more on the designs of brains or
markets. Step one is the really urgent need for deploying unbreakable operating
systems, with a proper balance between privacy and law enforcement, exactly as
detailed in www.werbos.com/NATO_terrorism.pdf,
in press.”
That paper also discussed
some entertaining stuff about research for forward time cameras (FTC) and backward
time telegraph (BTT), which it described as 50-50 long-term maybe-possibilities.
The operating system stuff is near-term and well founded, but this NATO
workshop was for futurists. After the conference, I decided to look into the FTC and BTT stuff more carefully, as in
step two of the four-step exploration I proposed (even though step one is still
awaiting
the experimentalists). I was surprised to learn that the literature
on quantum ghost imaging is as shaky, at bottom, as the thermal-light entangled
photons turned out to be. But I found six or seven alternative, better grounded
pathways, and
there may even be an
experiment in process on the first and easiest (though least powerful) of the six
or seven. That could be fun.
By the way, the odd resonance
I mentioned with Donald Trump seems to be over, at least for now. Not a trace
for about a week. Latin America, and folks worried about their personal
freedom, and (of course) some quantum physics have taken over some airways.
And I have been reminded that
there are interesting parallels between the Republican Party and Russia – both very
forceful but both wrestling with incredible and incredibly important inner
contradictions.
In fact, I also mentioned to
the Heritage person: “The apparent conflict between science and religion is one
of the basic reasons why our situation seems so hard and hopeless, not only
between the West and Islam, but inside the US as well.
When the contradictions are
left fallow... it is like repression in the brain... it causes chronic problems
as bad as the obvious acute ones. It causes erosion of ethics and morality, as
people do not know what to believe and regress to myopia and incoherence. “ So
maybe it is important that the principles of objective reality and mathematics,
on the one hand, and of spirit and noosphere and Pater Galacticus, are utterly
consistent with each other, in one universe without any kind of dualism needed,
objectively, as in www.werbos,com/Mind_in_Time.pdf.
Getting the foundations right is really crucial.
Best of luck...
===========
small addendum: if my resonant circuit with Trump is off, what of other resonances that were supporting him? At least one focus of thought has been shifting from the election to economics. Serious, real economics, not the plastic ideological kind. I meant to say that earlier today... forgot.. was reminded by CNN.
===========
small addendum: if my resonant circuit with Trump is off, what of other resonances that were supporting him? At least one focus of thought has been shifting from the election to economics. Serious, real economics, not the plastic ideological kind. I meant to say that earlier today... forgot.. was reminded by CNN.
No comments:
Post a Comment