Must we choose between Trump and war? The deep story.

This is serious, folks, and urgent.

Can any of you consider the possibility that I personally have had access to information on all sides, which dramatically changes the simplified guesstimates we see on CNN or in Trumps's statements?
Without any requirement to believe any psychic type inputs? Maybe not, but as a matter of due diligence, I do feel some duty to say a few things at a time when it would be possible in principle to avoid the worst. THINGS ARE NOT WHAT THEY SEEM ON A SUPERFICIAL QUICK LOOK.

Last week, in Rio and in airports and airplanes to and from Rio, I had lots of conversations with well-placed people from all over the earth. In fact, my paper given at the WCCI2018 conference,
www.werbos.com/E/GridIOT.pdf, gives lots of references you can check if you do not believe me, including:

[23] U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, Open Hearing on Worldwide Threats, Feb. 13, 2018, https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/hearings/op en-hearing-worldwide-threats-hearing-1 and https://www.c-span.org/video/?440888-1/nationalsecurity-leaders-testify-world-wide-threats&live

As one part of that hearing, you can see that ALL major US intelligence agencies place great emphasis on understanding what's next in "the new AI." Since this was the world's most advanced conference in that field, sponsored very visibly by McAfee, is it possible that very interesting people were candid with me (a key technical leader there) , in environments relatively free form recording?
People from all over the world?

Key people from outside the US were generally livid about Trump. Let's face it: personal insults (and flattery) DO have big effects on people all over the world, even political leaders. When humans are insulted, their brains are flooded with hormones which tend to block the higher rational faculties. Trump knows that, obviously, but equally obviously considers it rational to allow in his own brain.

My first answer to their questions: I compared him to another person (a very well-meaning Democrat,  not Hillary) who firmly believes in a kind of "honesty" and "spontaneity" which means saying whatever pops into one's mind without a whole lot of censorship, even for objective analytical truth or for what one might say the very next day. And yes, Trump has DONE some truly horrid dumb things. And yet... I qthen uoted (without naming) a person who recently left the Trump White House, who never spoke to the press, who was far more candid with friends than most of the folks CNN talks to.

Her position: "Trump is not so bad. He really wants to do some very important things which need to be done. The problem is that he is surrounded by  so many bad people, advisers who were thrust on  him by the swamp, because he did not have enough personal contact with people who have the technical, substantive knowledge he needs. Their power struggles are MUCH more than the simple personality conflicts the press seems to imagine. They are the ones who digest most of Trump's efforts to do good things, and output .. digestive products... many of which make the swamp much worse."

Yes, Trump has done some truly horrid things, which threaten the Republic. Perhaps the worst is to carelessly appoint judges likely to maintain the ban on limits to legalized corruption, money in politics, which is FAR worse now than just the partial view shown in the well-documented book Dark Money (one of Hilary's favorites, her friends tell me, along with Brock's book, equally partial). The wires from dark money to the offices of the whips to so-called "secret societies" (outside groups improperly warping operations within government agencies, undoing the work of Teddy Roosevelt) are the core of the REAL swamp, not the little puppets who get forcibly danced around on those strings.

And yet, I warn them all: Trump himself is NOT the worst threat here and now. Ironically, though he has done much to serve the swamp (unwittingly, through his lack of understanding), he has also resisted far more effectively than Hillary would have been able to do. Her outcomes in the State Department show clearly that she did not understand the puppet strings  and more than Trump did,
and she really would have ended up like Rousseff of Brazil if she had been elected. The "swamp" was undecided about whether to get rid of Trump or not, since he has done so much to advance their interests long-term.

BUT JUST YESTERDAY, the scene changed.

What I told folks last week was: "Be careful. There are folks around Trump who are far less talkative, and far less spontaneous, far more calculated, and far more dangerous in what they want to do."
For example, DON'T UNDERESTIMATE Crown Prince Mohammed of Saudi Arabia. Please, folks, whatever you do, pray for his long life and success -- which should not be taken for granted." Some of the most important wires go back to the Moslem Brotherhood. More precisely, that Brotherhood has integrated a group of billionnaires in Qatar, Turkey and Saudi Arabia itself, along with the Gulf-based service company Halliburton which services them, and several of its colleagues. Years ago, with my usual improbably good luck (sorry, folks), I obtained a planning document directly from that group, showing that they depend above all on a war between US and Israel versus Iran and Russia as phase two atfer phase one, the war with iraq which they and their lackeys engineered. To let them pick up the pieces, and prevent them from uniting against them. "Third Caliphate" they say.

Yes, folks, I am accusing the head of a Persian Gulf service company of being a traitor to the Republic, and very much imitating the role of Palpatine in the Star Wars movie. Did he really try to poison "W" after the SOTU on addiction to oil? In truth, a courier actually did bring me information on his meeting of friends after that speech. (Not so strange, but what was that about methods and sources? No, I didn't seek the information; it just came to me, very very physically. By the way, there probably is a press story somewhere about the big talk I gave at Rayburn two weeks before that SOTU, arranged by a House Republican helping "W". In the smaller Senate one, I was part of a two-man show with Woolsey, and maybe that got press.)

It was in the press that Cheney got rid of "lawyer barriers" in the government, and forced all kinds of intelligence sharing and even private sector access. I think that Senator Feinstein, in that hearing above, noted that the worst leaks which now endanger the power grid, came form CONTRACTORS, private sector firms with full access to everything. Maybe, thanks to Watson, more access and reality information than what the President has.

So now the folks whose top priority is to be loyal troopers to that extragovernmental network (which does not tell its puppets whose money pulls the strings) are pushing VERY hard for that war with Russia.

Sure, Putin is not perfect any more than Trump. Nor was Saddam Hussein. But careless war hysteria would end up worse than what Trump is doing.

Any hope to stop that war? Not if CNN and Dems let themselves be manipulated into hysteria,
per "edge of chaos" regime change (well-known to folks who plan regime changes), into war.
Hysteria is not the most effective policy, to put it mildly.

Swamp wants Rouda, to avoid risk of anything added to the conversation... to suppress any voice against war.

==========

Added at 3PM: Trump caves to the swamp just now and to the House, clearly lies. God help us.
Purchases nonimpeachment by promising money, guaranteed to cause future sequestration or devastating deficits. A step towards liquidating the US public sector, and deeper cutbacls to education.